Deal flow that asked for you first

You state your mandate — sector, cheque size, geography, control or minority — and we introduce you to companies whose owners have stated they are seeking exactly that. Nothing is scraped and nobody is cold-contacted: the company has already said it wants a conversation with a firm like yours before you ever see it.

Neither, strictly. Every company here posted its own intent rather than being listed by an intermediary, and introductions are reciprocal — the owner accepted you specifically. There is no fee-taking intermediary in the middle and no list that gets shopped to fifty firms.

Yes. An intent can be stated anonymously: counterparts see your position, mandate and criteria without your firm's name until you accept an introduction. That matters for a fund that does not want its thesis read by competitors.

Yes. Cheque size is a criterion rather than a gate, so a searcher writing a $2M cheque and a fund writing $200M use the same mechanism and simply match differently.

Yes — that is a position in its own right. State that you are seeking co-investors with the sector and cheque size, and you are matched with other investors who stated the same. It is the one position that matches with itself. And when you lead a deal, you can offer part of it to verified firms whose mandate fits, without naming the company; you see a firm’s name once it says it’s interested.

Yes. Fund managers raising and LPs allocating are complementary positions. A manager states the fund the way an LP screens it (fund number, vintage, strategy, target and hard cap, minimum commitment, track record and terms), an LP states what it invests in, and introductions show how the two line up. As everywhere else, both sides accept before identities are exchanged — which matters more in fundraising than almost anywhere.

Yes, both sides: selling a fund position and buying one are complementary positions.

Yes. Plenty of useful investor relationships are exploratory — understanding another firm's thesis, finding a partner for future deals, or comparing notes on a sector. State that as your intent and you will be matched with firms doing the same.

Yes. Lenders seeking borrowers and companies seeking credit are complementary positions, matched on facility size, sector and structure.

All are criteria on your intent rather than separate products. State what you actually do and you are matched against owners who want that specific thing — which is usually where a mismatched conversation goes wrong.

You select from a structured list of 112 industries grouped into sectors, rather than typing free text. That means an investor in B2B SaaS is matched precisely with B2B SaaS, closely with adjacent software, and not at all with freight — no guessing about what either side meant by a word.

As many as genuinely fit, up to your weekly allowance. We would rather introduce you to three companies that match your mandate than thirty that do not — the constraint is deliberate, because a feed of marginal deals is the thing you already have too much of.

Yes. On the Team plan the firm’s owner invites colleagues as admins or members. Everyone works the same deal-flow board, with an owner, a next step and team notes on each deal; admins also answer introductions for the firm. A firm can sign in through its identity provider (Okta, Microsoft Entra ID or Google Workspace), and an audit log records who did what.

You are never contacted by anyone you have not accepted. There is no inbox to pitch into, no browsing of investors, and no way to message you first — which is the entire difference between this and every other platform where you have been found.